Reasons to Not Have an Abortion #4

Another in my Reasons to Not Have an Abortion series.

#4: Abortion propagates race and gender selectivity.

For one, if you didn’t already know it, the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger was a supporter of eugenics (in the worst way…wanting to use it against minorities) and wanted to use abortion to achieve her ends. I don’t know about you, but it sounds an awful lot like what was probably said in Nazi Germany back in the day. So, if you allow abortion for reasons of controlling the populations of different races and ethnicities, you would be limiting the diversity of this planet because you are deliberately choosing to extinguish a people…and in my  opinion, that hurts the credibility of the liberal position since they are all for diversity at whatever cost.

As for the gender side, take a look at China. Traditionally, as with many other countries, boys were the preferred gender of a child. You all may remember that China previously had their one-child-policy (now the two-child-policy). If you, like your ancestors really want a boy, that only gives you essentially one chance to get what you want (assuming you are not going to abort whatever child is conceived), so if you find out your child is a girl, you may be tempted to just abort the child, so you can try again for a boy. Because of this, they currently have an imbalance between the genders. Even without the whole mess of the limitation of the amount of children you can have, abortion seems to present itself as a tantalizing solution to a desire of having a child that’s one gender over the other (rather than just accepting what you have been given).

Thus, it seems to me that to have an abortion for one of the reasons described above would then be racism and sexism, so I guess that means that you can argue (especially in the case with gender) that liberals are not actually against racism and sexism as they claim to be.

The Difference Between Christian and Muslim Reactions to LGBTQ “Rights” (As Exemplified by Indonesia)

I found this article on the NZ Conservative Coalition blog, and it perfectly describes the blindness the LGBTQ community has with Islam and the difference between Christian and Muslim thoughts about it. As the article asserts (and I also agree), we may not agree with or like all this sexual and gender deviation, but your average Christian isn’t going to go out and stone someone who deviates like that just because we don’t like their deviation. However, if you let the Islamic influence of Sharia Law in, something like that probably will happen. Enjoy!

The LGBT community need to wake up and smell the Islamic coffee

I cannot believe this picture.

I got this from one of my great-aunts, and the things that our elected representatives, who are supposed to serve and love this country, do to disrespect this country just makes me mad. I would think that it should be a given that you should love the country that you serve. Standing for the Pledge of Allegiance should be given—if you are a representative of the country, it follows that you should be committed to helping and bettering that country. I don’t care what country you’re from. Is that really too hard to ask, or do we just have a bunch of traitors in our Congress (honestly, I think the latter, a lot of the time)?


If this doesn’t make you mad, nothing will.
  If they won’t stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance,
In my opinion…they have no place in our Congress.
Any member of the house or senate that refuse to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance in the Chambers should be escorted out by the
Sergeant of Arms until they comply. If your allegiance is not with this country and our flag, just who is it with?
Why don’t we ask someone like Minnesota’s Muslim congressman Keith Ellison!
Let’s cut off their pay  — and all benefits. Give the ingrates two days to decide to retire or be impeached.